|
January 5th, 2008
The Times of Malta
Riding the wave
Malcolm Scerri-Ferrante
reviews the film business in Malta and warns about crew shortages
inhibiting the industry’s growth.
Another
year has passed with Malta witnessing yet another vibrant film-servicing
industry. Several productions have been shot on the island ranging from
a sizable Russian feature – Man Of East – to a small children’s film,
part of a Danish trilogy –
The Lost
Treasures Of The Knights Templar III – and to
one of France’s biggest films of the year –
Largo Winch.
Parts of other productions, namely the British TV productions Roman
Mysteries, Warriors and Coronation Street, the German film U-900 and the
mini-series Harbour Of Hope and the popular Italian TV series
Carabinieri all fell nicely into the year’s “gaps”, making 2007 one
of the busiest in recent years.
Keeping up the trend for 2008 is one of
Europe’s most challenging features, which started prepping in Malta last
fall and is scheduled for filming this coming spring.
Moreover, the government has recently
increased its maximum cash rebate from 20 per cent to 22 per cent of
eligible expenditure. This increase is notably for films which depict
Malta as itself. The government is beginning to recognise the positive
impact that films can have on the tourism industry.
Producers of films which depict countries
other than Malta but which still pass the newly-introduced cultural test
can still look forward to a substantially increased rebate now that a
larger portion of their budget shall be eligible. This is because
expenses incurred in Malta and related to EU-based crew and suppliers
are now also eligible for the rebate. Previously only selected
expenditure of the “Maltese spend” (Maltese labour and Maltese services)
was eligible.
This is very much a 180-degree turnaround
by the Maltese government. When formulating the incentives for the first
time back in 2005, the government was very intent on basing the cash
rebate exclusively on expenses that were in some form or manner also
traced to the government’s coffers. With the European Commission now
regulating policies on financial incentives, a cultural test is now
being imposed for each production. Moreover, no discrimination is being
allowed between Maltese or EU services.
This makes Malta’s cash rebate
substantially more attractive and, despite the looming US film union
strikes, the new incentives can still potentially lead to a boost of
“European-content” films coming to Malta.
So there is cause for celebration, at
least in hindsight. However, film crews are still scarce on the island,
especially where first-class professionals are concerned. The total
number of local pros and “semi-pros” combined usually represents between
40 and 65 per cent of any film’s shooting crew depending on its size and
demands. Two or more productions prepping and/or shooting at the same
time naturally present a difficult and uneconomical situation for
producers who are then compelled to bring into Malta more foreign crew.
Through the introduction of financial
incentives and a film-friendly mentality instilled within government
departments, Malta has in recent years managed to keep itself in the
limelight of both the US and European film industries. However, the
formulation of a consistent policy on the training and development of
local film crews is still forthcoming. A self-financed and non-profit
making short course proposed in 2006 was rejected on the basis of lack
of policy concerning private initiatives.
There is a need for Malta to review,
polish or create its film policy specifically on developing local human
resources. It needs to implement a strategy whereby qualified film crews
are increased in a manner that is not solely reliant on the natural
evolvement expected from increased work flows.

MFS’ model making has
attracted many producers to work in Malta. Angelo Delia (right) is the
Construction Manager and the last remaining full-time model maker at MFS.
Training schemes are also urgently needed for such specialized skills
The year 2007 turned out to be even busier
than expected, with a period when four productions overlapped each
other. Due to the lack of experienced crew, no fewer than eight trainees
were engaged on the French film
Largo Winch,
all of whom are now either still working in the industry or following
film-related courses in Europe. If every film gave a similar boost to
these newcomers by engaging them as trainees then, sure enough, Malta
would be solving part of this problem. But there needs to be a much
faster pace by which Maltese can learn the film trade in order to
embrace the amount of film work coming to Malta, in order to safeguard
the efficient support of future work loads and to ensure a solid growth
in this industry.
It is easy for some to undermine the
gravity of this situation as there are politicians who share the spirit
of this industry but who do not always truly understand its exigencies.
The overall policies and strategies for this industry have to be
intelligent ones consisting of various plans activated in timely stages.
The lack of professional film crews
seriously restricts Malta’s attractiveness for many producers who are
seeking to pay Maltese crew rates. Bringing in foreign crews not only
translates into higher salaries/wages but also into additional flight,
hotel and living expenses. In the same way the government wisely decided
to introduce a small film production fund, it would perhaps be an idea
for it to introduce a training fund that would subsidise the costs for
Maltese to train in certain recognised institutions abroad.
There are some crew members who have
managed to garner experience in the recent surge of productions and who
are taking advantage of the current market forces but, sadly, only to
the extent of demanding salary increases that are inconsistent with the
Maltese cost expectancy of foreign producers. This, of course, only
aggravates the crew shortage problem and some producers are compelled to
engage lesser-trained individuals on their films. The only positive
repercussion is that this leads to faster kick-starts or quicker
promotions for new emerging talent.
If the current healthy trend of film work
is not to be threatened then, with some optimism, crew members will
learn to adjust their fees according to the respective film budgets.
Salary increases are acceptable to most producers if these are in line
with the rate of inflation and/or in accordance with increased
experiences or responsibilities.
Instead of trying to jump up the ladder
career-wise, some crew members would be better off focusing on achieving
first-class levels in their professions before discussing wage
increases. Malta is one the few countries in the world where first-time
trainees habitually expect to get paid. In most countries trainees are
queuing up behind production managers’ doors eager to work for free in
order to learn and obtain their first movie credit. Whether this is due
to Malta’s size or not may be debatable.
Another restraining factor affecting the
growth of this industry is the limited or absent local infrastructure
where specialised film equipment and sound stages are concerned.
Financial incentives for investors are not proving to be effective
enough. Perhaps the government should look into providing an alternative
method of aid in order to give a boost to new investments.
The introduction of a small film fund of
about $300,000 for local productions, however small, is a positive sign
that the country wants to nurture its talented film makers. Such schemes
give a great boost to emerging new talent and could gradually lead to a
small but consistent home-grown film business. What has yet to be seen
is the formulation of a qualified and professional film board to ensure
that the right projects get selected and to ensure these public funds do
not get wasted on the likes of unwatchable attempts at so-called local
“features”, which have been produced in recent years.
Mediterranean Film Studios (MFS) has
managed to keep its head steadily above the water despite its skeleton
staff and other limitations.
Should one look back at critical periods
in the company’s 43-year old history, one would hope that any new
shareholders would nurture the growth of the industry in a way that
there is no attempt to begin monopolising it and in a way that the
company’s growth actually benefits from its own profits.
One should not underestimate the crucial
part MFS plays in the growth of this industry. Although times have
changed and some productions are nowadays able to film in Malta
independently of MFS, the fact remains that the water tanks serve as a
popular attraction to producers and this places MFS at least on par, in
the sense of importance, with Malta’s valuable locations and cash
rebate.
Hopefully, good decisions will be made by
the government and no less by the players in this industry. One is
tempted to throw full responsibility on the government but really and
truly every individual working in this industry has an impact on its
growth and on the island’s reputation. With some optimism Malta will
ride well the current wave of increased productions so that the positive
trend is enjoyed in the long term and this wave does not become a
short-lived experience simply because of lack of foresight. |